The possible worlds of international politics

As of 2023, and for several years now international politics has reached an extremely depressing state.  This has had a profound effect on my personal mental and physical health, and I'm sure its had a similar effect on much of  the youth around the world, watching people be burned alive, slaughtered and broadcast on international media, dead children be retrieved from collapsed buildings,  people claim that others need to leave because 'God' told them that they have rights to a particular land, millions killing each other because of a sense of injustice or unfairness.

We are also in a climate crisis, there are several wars raging, innocent people are dying and the rich are getting richer. Most Western Liberal Democracies are not democracies anymore, they are neoliberal plutocracies which also hold most of the worlds financial, economic, technological and military power. Much of the rest of the world is either a military junta, dictatorship, theocracy or a client state for one of the great powers. In some cases, like Niger, their coups are designed with the purpose of rectifying the unfair and injust conditions they find themlsevles in. Historically, the West, led by American military power would intervene in circumstances like this and assassinate its leader or destabilise its leadership. Similar ambitions can be found in the former Soviet government which also consistently felt that it always had a just cause for any kind of interventionism that advanced Communism. 

The global public needs to be politically informed to see that great power competition is at its end, one way or another. Our leaders today are as responsible for this as are (to a greater extent) the people who established these systems. Today's leaders inherited the systems they find themselves in, and are not fully responsible for the intergenerational plans for each others' mutual domination.

The pursuit of these plans for the purpose of one's nation's 'national interest' has become farcical and genocidal. This is partly because the idea of a nation, or even a country is merely a convenient geofenced way to define identity that collects living memories, historical narratives, grievances, points of pride and excellence, scorekeeping between neighbouring peoples as well as between countries. We are almost identical, and yet the world continues to be divided in this way.

Following the events that have occurred this year, I've read a lot about various conspiracy theories and discovering America's legislation on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena, Non-human intelligence and recovered craft and biological material has made me deeply question my own understanding of international politics.

Assuming that the disclosure on the aforementioned matters is credible, here are the 7 possible worlds I can see as a member of the public with no access to privileged information:

1) That the Pentagon is liaising with or is controlled by an alien force which either has resided on Earth before or seeks to colonise or exploit it 

2) That multiple countries are liaising or are under control of alien forces which have either resided on Earth before or seek to colonise or exploit it

3) That our governments have created Artificial Intelligence systems and are now no longer able to control them because the Artificial Intelligence has tethered itself to something other than their instructions

4) That we've always had hidden non-human intelligent species on Earth and our governments have either found them and/or have learned to communicate with them and/or have always been able to communicate with them and have not disclosed this

5) That God exists, and they have been hiding the true nature of the universe from us because they are afraid of what may happen, or what we may think

6) That we live in a universe in which quantum, psychic or any other distance-independent relations can decide occurrences in the world, including by individual beings or degrees of collective agency with capability for instantaneous as well as gradual catalysis


7) That some combination of the aforementioned possible worlds is true

Any and all of these variations are highly disturbing if any of our governments and international governance bodies have known about this and have actively persecuted people for preventing disclosure about this, and its potential consequences.

It is possible that this disclosure is not credible and is a complete 'psyop' but it would have to be extremely sophisticated, and will compromise many people involved, and as such I am leaning on the side of this disclosure being credible. 

Just imagine how many calculations a brain has to make when considering these possibilities in the context of the history of our planet and all of its people and cultures, and then to try to trajectorize every possible world with consideration of every country's national interest, the interest of their power structures, the interest of all their factions and secret societies. Once you have imagined this, imagine iterating it every day of your life until you obtain a set of hypothesised data that enables you to establish what is likely to be the most credible credence about what is occurring on our planet, with consideration to causation, and the intentions as well as purposes of each individual representative and group involved as well as attempting at a reasonable evaluation of the existence of any world you think is possible. Once you can do this as an individual human being, then you can blame me for anything that I have done, not done, could've done or should've done, or blame our authorities for not being transparent enough with the public for us to have the total information required to make an informed decision about whether we should vote on something, or whether someone is elected. Just listen to the 2022 Victorian Election debates, what a complete farce. 

If there is any alien control over governments on our planet, make it known now. I volunteer to be one of humanity's representatives to whatever forces are out there, should anyone choose me. We have never ceded our sovereignty, and collectively we are not sufficiently informed. 

As far as I'm concerned, its impossible for our authorities to hide information anymore. Its either inductible, deductible or your foes will release it. There are no secrets anymore. Everything will one day go public and we will judge it collectively and by consensus as John Rawls intended, and we will build a fair society in doing so. 

Lastly, people in positions of power need to realise that the hierarchy has now been reversed, and I will do everything in my power to ensure that this is accelerated reasonably. The youth are your masters, not the other way around. You serve them, and the future that they choose to create, and they are generally more 'progressive' than you - internationally. You can't hold progress back, you can only mediate and redirect it, and if you choose to mediate/redirect it rather than holding it back, I will seek to be your best friend. If you choose to try to hold it back, you will fail and you will face the consequences that the youth will impose on you that they feel you should be accountable for, and their judgment is likely to be significantly harsher than mine. 

Change the world now, you know the vibe, or there will be consequences that I may not be able to influence.